NationalSaturday, 31 October 2026·The Hindu - National
Delhi HC PIL on CAPF deployment raises Articles 14, 19 and 21 questions
A former civil servant has challenged the large-scale deployment and extension of CAPF companies in Delhi, citing constitutional concerns under Articles 14, 19 and 21.
Key highlights
Direct fact
In October 2026, former civil servant Ashish Joshi moved the Delhi High Court against the large-scale deployment of Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs) in Delhi, citing constitutional concerns under Articles 14, 19 and 21.
Key specifics
- Reports cited in the PIL said 301 CAPF companies were initially approved for deployment in Delhi.
- Of these, 273 companies were extended until 31 October 2026.
- A further extension of 270 companies was reported until 16 November 2026.
- The petition seeks disclosure of Union Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) orders and Delhi Police requisitions.
- The PIL asks for a written protocol on CAPF deployment for protest-related public order duties.
Exam lens
Polity and constitutional law, Articles 14, 19 and 21, CAPF deployment, PIL, Delhi High Court — TNPSC may ask which fundamental rights are invoked when public order deployment is challenged.